User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Art 3G Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.94 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 28.0Android 4.2unknown ExplayArt 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.2ExplayArt 3GTabletyesyes0.12101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.27403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.2tabletyes0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.2.2Art 3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.94WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 28.0.1500.94Blink Android 4.2.2Art 3Gtabletyescloseclose0.09301 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:56 | by ThaDafinser