User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8) AppleWebKit/537.19+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Safari/536.25
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
WebKit Nightly Build OS X Mountain Lion 10.8Webkit 537.19desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.0WebKit MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 6.0closeOS X 10.8desktop-browsercloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 6.0WebKit Mac 10.8desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0closeOS X 10.8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 537.19closeMac OS X 10.8closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0closeOS X 10.8closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 6.0WebKit 537.19Mac OS X 10.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
WebKit Nightly Build Webkit 537.19OS X Mountain Lion 10.8desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 6.0.5closeMac OS X 10.8.4Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:56 | by ThaDafinser