User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S3370C/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 Dolfin/1.5 Qtv/5.3 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1 OPN-N
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S3370C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-S3370C 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 1.5close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin 1.5WebKit SamsungGT-S3370Csmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 1.5close SamsungGT-S3370Ccloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 1.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 1.5 Touchwiz 2.0SamsungCorby 3Gmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:55 | by ThaDafinser