User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dragon/43.3.3.176 Chrome/43.0.2357.81 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Dragon 43.3Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dragon 43.3Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.22002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 43.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 43.0.2357closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.13201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.81WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Comodo Dragon 43.3Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.06801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:55 | by ThaDafinser