User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; SD4930UR Build/KTU84P) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/34.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-fireos.yaml
Amazon WebView FireOS Blink 537.36AmazonFire Phonemobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.4AmazonFire Phonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.24402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 34.0Blink Android 4.4AmazonFire Phonesmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 34.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.4SD4930URcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.17202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 34.0.0.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Amazon WebView Blink FireOS AmazonFire Phonemobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 34closeAndroid 4.4AmazonFire PhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:54 | by ThaDafinser