User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv7l; U; InettvBrowser/2.2(00014A;SonyDTV115;0002;0100) KDL-46EX640; CC/USA; en) Presto/2.8.115 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sony.yaml
Opera Devices 3.0 Presto 2.8.115SonyBravia EX640 Smart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.10Presto 2.8Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.05701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.10closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.27603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.10Presto GNU/Linux SonyKDL-46EX640tv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.10closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2Presto 2.8.115Linux Sony KDL- Digital TVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.0Presto 2.8.115 SonyBravia EX640 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:54 | by ThaDafinser