User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 3.2; xx; GTV100 Build/MASTER) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/google.yaml
Chrome Google TV Webkit 534.13NETGEARNeoTV Primetelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 3.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 3.2GenericAndroid 3.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 3.2NetgearNeoTV Primetvyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 3.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 3.2closeAndroid 3.2GTV100closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 3.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.13Android 3.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Webkit 534.13Google TV NETGEARNeoTV Primetelevisioncloseclose0.026 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 3.2closeAndroid 3.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:53 | by ThaDafinser