User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; Nokia501l/0.1325.0; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/3.1.1.0.9
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia501l Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.07701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 3.1Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia501lsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 0.1325.0;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 3.1.1closeNokia Series 40 Nokia501lcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 3.1.1.0.9Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 501lcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 3.1.1Gecko Series40 Nokia501lmobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 1.8closeNokia Series 40 NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:53 | by ThaDafinser