User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DirectFB; Linux 35230) AppleWebKit/534.26+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/534.26+ LG Browser/4.1.4(+mouse+3D+PORTAL_KEY+SCREEN+TUNER; LGE; GLOBAL-PLAT3; 09.00.00; 0x00000001;); LG NetCast.TV-2011
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGLOBAL-PLAT3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.10801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.0WebKit GNU/Linux LGNetCasttv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 534.26closeLinux LGGLOBAL-PLAT3closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.26Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LG Browser 4.1Webkit 534.26 LGNetCast TV 2011televisioncloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:53 | by ThaDafinser