User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android Donut; en-us; HTC_Lexikon_C Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1 CSOUTH-6325
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCLexikon C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.1WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.06901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid GenericAndroid 1.6mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android HTCLexikon Csmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 1.2closeAndroid 1.2HTCLexikon Ccloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.11601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 3.1.2WebKit 528.2Android HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 528.2Android HTCLexikon Cmobile:smartyescloseclose0.12101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 1.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.048 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:52 | by ThaDafinser