User agent detail

MOT-MT680_TD/1.0 Android/2.3 (Linux; Android 2.3) Release/04.13.2012 Browser/WAP 2.0 AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaMT680_TD Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3MotorolaMOTOLUXE MT680mobile-browseryescloseclose0.31403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3MotorolaMT680smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3MotorolaMT680_TDcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.10301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3MotorolaMOTOLUXE MT680mobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3MotorolaMT680Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:52 | by ThaDafinser