User agent detail

[FBAN/PAAA;FBAV/1.7;FBDM/{density=2.0,width=720,height=1280};FBLC/es_ES;FB_FW/2;FBSN/Android;FBCR/FONIC;FBDV/GT-I9300;FBSV/4.1.2;]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-767.php
Facebook App 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Facebook App WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.04501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid mobile-browseryescloseclose0.31303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Facebook 1.7 Android SamsungGALAXY S IIIsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Facebook 1.7closeAndroid closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android SamsungGalaxy S IIIcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.07701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:52 | by ThaDafinser