User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; LG-D620 Build/KOT49I.A1389586651) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.103 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGD620 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.10101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.103closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 30.0.1599.103closeAndroid 4.4.2LGD620mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 30.0Blink Android 4.4LGD620smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.103closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 30.0.1599closeAndroid 4.4.2LGD620closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.13101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.103WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2LGLGD620closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 30Blink Android 4.4.2LGG2 minimobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.103closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 30closeAndroid 4.4LGD620Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:51 | by ThaDafinser