User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; QQDownload 691; Maxthon; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-maxthon.yaml
Maxthon Windows XP desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Maxthon 2.0Trident WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Maxthon closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Maxthon Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Maxthon 0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Maxthon closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQDownload Download Manager 691 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 6.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:51 | by ThaDafinser