User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; cs-cz; HTC_TATTOO_A3288 Build/DRC79) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCTATTOO A3288 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.1WebKit Android 1.6Mobile Phoneyesyes0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.6HTCTattoomobile-browseryescloseclose0.25302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 1.6HTCTATTOO A3288smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 1.6closeAndroid 1.6HTCTATTOO A3288closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 1.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 3.1.2WebKit 528.5Android 1.6HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 528.5Android 1.6HTCTattoomobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 1.6closeAndroid 1.6HTCTattooFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.06001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:51 | by ThaDafinser