User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.2.2; en-US; iris405+) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.0.460 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
UC Browser 9.4.0.460Android 4.2.2 LavaIris 405+smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.4U2 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close LavaiRIS 405+mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4 Android 4.2LavaIris 405+smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2LavaIris 405+closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.19602 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.4.0.460 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.50005 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.4Gecko Android 4.2.2LavaIris 405+mobile:smartyescloseclose0.026 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2LavaiRIS 405+Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:51 | by ThaDafinser