User agent detail

Karbonn K222s WAP-Browser/1.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
KarbonnK222sfeature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Karbonn closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close KarbonnK222smobile-browseryescloseclose0.21802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
KarbonnK222sfeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Karbonn Mobilescloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
KarbonnK222smobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:51 | by ThaDafinser