User agent detail

AMOI-E72/1.0/WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; Smartphone)/UCWEB7.0.0.33/33/800
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AmoiE72 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeWindows AmoiE72mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.0 Windows CE AmoiE72smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.0.0closeWindows CE AmoiE72closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.0.0.33closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.0.0.33 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.0Gecko Series60 NokiaE72mobile:smartyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile AmoiE72Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:50 | by ThaDafinser