User agent detail

Mozilla/3.01Gold (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 i86pc)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-solaris.yaml
Netscape Navigator 3.0.1Solaris 2.5.1 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 3.0Gecko SunOS Desktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 3.0.1closeSolaris 2.5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Solaris 5.5desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 3.01GoldcloseSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 3 Gold 3.01Gold SunOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Navigator 3.0.1 Solaris 2.5.1desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Japan Radio CompanyWX330JFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:50 | by ThaDafinser