User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Boxee/1.0.1 bxapi/7.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Boxee 1.0.1 Webkit 533.4television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Boxee 1.0.1close media-playercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 533.4Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Boxee 1.0.1Webkit 533.4 televisioncloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Boxee BoxSmart-TVcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:49 | by ThaDafinser