User agent detail

RhythmDisplayAdSDK-E-Android SAMSUNG-SGH-I777-4.0.3-43074
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-I777-4 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
RhythmDisplayAdSDK-E-Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid SamsungGalaxy S IImobile-browseryescloseclose0.26403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungSGH-I777smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid SamsungSGH-I777-4closeclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android SamsungGalaxy S IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:49 | by ThaDafinser