User agent detail

Vodafone/1.0/HTC Touch HD T8282/1.14.163.2 (28253) Opera/9.50 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 8.12; MSIEMobile 6.5)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCTouch HD T8282 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows HTCHD2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.87909 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.50Presto Windows CE HTCTouch HDsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.50closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.50closeWindows CE HTCTouch HD T8282closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.50closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.50 Windows HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.50 Windows Mobile 6.5HTCTouch HDmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:49 | by ThaDafinser