User agent detail

Opera/9.70 (BREW 4.0.3; U; en; Samsung; Opera Mobi; Presto/2.2.1/INT) Sprint M850 SprintTitan/OSGi-4.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SprintM850 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.70closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile close SamsungM850mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.70Presto Brew 4.0SamsungOpera Mobismartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.70close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 9.70closeBREW 4.0.3SprintM850closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.70Presto 2.2.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.70Presto 2.2.1Brew 4.0.3Samsung; Opera Mobi; Prestomobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.70closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile close SamsungM850Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:49 | by ThaDafinser