User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; FreeBSD 5.3-RC2 i386) Opera 6.12 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
FreeBSD 5.3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera FreeBSD Desktop0.05201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 6.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 6.12closeBSD 5.3-RC2desktop-browsercloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 6.12Presto FreeBSD 5.3desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 6.12closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.12closeFreeBSD 5.3closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 6.12closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 6.12 FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 6.12 FreeBSD 5.3desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:49 | by ThaDafinser