User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0 compatible; Asterias Crawler v4; http://www.singingfish.com/help/spider.html; webmaster@singingfish.com); SpiderThread Revision: 3.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Asterias Crawler 4 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesAsterias Crawlerclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MSIE close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49805 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 6.0 closeclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:48 | by ThaDafinser