User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; MT6572 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.114 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonMT6572 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 34.0Blink Android 4.2smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 34.0.1847closeAndroid 4.2.2SonyEricssonMT6572closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.04501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.50805 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 34Blink Android 4.2.2MediatekMT6572 based devicedevboardcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 4.2closeAndroid 4.2SymphonyXplorer w72 MT6572/V1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.12401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:48 | by ThaDafinser