User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux) AppleWebKit/534.51 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ekioh/2.2.4.7-moto-mob Safari/534.51:534 Motorola KreaTV STB VIP1003
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/kreatv.yaml
Ekioh 2.2.4.7 Webkit 534.51MotorolaKreaTVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.51closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 534.51closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux MotorolaKreaTVsmartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.51Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Ekioh 2.2.4.7Webkit 534.51 MotorolaKreaTVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux MotorolaEvokeFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:47 | by ThaDafinser