User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) KHTML/4.11.3 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.11 Fedora/4.11.3-1.fc19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 4.11Fedora 19KHTML 4.11.3desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.11KHTML 4.11Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.07401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.11closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.11KHTML Fedora 4.11desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.11closeFedora 4.11.3closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.11 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.11KHTML 4.11.3Fedora 19desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:47 | by ThaDafinser