User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U; Win NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows NT Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.8Gecko 1.8 Desktop0.06501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 1.5.0.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 1.5.0.2closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 1.5Gecko Windows desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 1.5.0.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 1.5.0closeWindows NT closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 1.5.0.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 1.5.0.2Gecko 20060308Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 1.5.0.2Gecko 1.8.0Windows desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 1.5.0.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 1.5.0.11closeWindows XPNovarraCTS reformatting proxyOther Non-Mobilecloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:47 | by ThaDafinser