User agent detail

nuSearch Spider www.nusearch.com (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows NT)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
nuSearch Spider Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesnuSearchBot/Crawler0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Internet Explorer 4.0.1closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesnuSearch Spiderclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesNusearch SpiderCrawler0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 4.0.1 Windows desktopcloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:47 | by ThaDafinser