User agent detail

Safari/6533.18.5 CFNetwork/454.9.8 Darwin/10.4.0 (i386) (MacBookPro7,1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Mac OS X 10.6.4 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 4.0WebKit MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6533.18.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari closeOS X 10.6desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac 10.6desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 454.9.8closeMac OS X 10.6.4AppleMacBookPro7,1closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Mac OS X 10.6desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
CFNetwork App closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:47 | by ThaDafinser