User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; KDDI-CA3B) Opera 8.60 [ja]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/carrier-kddi.yaml
Opera Mobile 8.60 CasioW62CAmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.60close desktop-browsercloseclose0.22102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.60Presto KDDICA3Bfeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.60close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.60close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.60close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.60 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 8.60 CasioW62CAmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer CA3Bcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close KDDIW62CAFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:46 | by ThaDafinser