User agent detail

MT6752_TD/V1 Linux/3.10.61 Android/5.0 Release/ Browser/AppleWebKit537.36 Chrome/37.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 System/Android 5.0;
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-814.php
Chrome 37.0Android 5.0unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 37.0Blink Android 5.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeAndroid 5.0MT6752mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 37.0Blink Android 5.0smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.0.0closeAndroid 5.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 37.0.0closeAndroid 5.0closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.08201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 37.0.0.0WebKit Android 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium WebView 37Webkit 537.36Android 5.0MT6752mobile:smartyescloseclose0.07701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 34closeAndroid 5.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:44 | by ThaDafinser