User agent detail

OneBrowser/3.2/HS-T92_TD/1.0 Android/2.2 Release/12.10.2011 Browser/AppleWebKit533.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
OneBrowser 3.2Android 2.2Webkit 533.1HisenseT92mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
OneBrowser 3.2WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
OneBrowser 3.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
OneBrowser 3.2closeAndroid 2.2HisenseT92mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ONE Browser 3.2WebKit Android 2.2HisenseHS-T92smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
ONE Browser 3.2closeAndroid 2.2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
OneBrowser 3.2WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OneBrowser 3.2Webkit 533.1Android 2.2HisenseT92mobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.07801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:44 | by ThaDafinser