User agent detail

GIONEE50_12864_11B_HW (MRE\\2.5.00(3072) resolution\\240320 chipset\\MT6250 touch\\1 tpannel\\0 camera\\1 gsensor\\0 keyboard\ ormal) 1307SY_0201_V1045 Release/2013.06.28 WAP Browser/MAUI (HTTP PGDL; HTTPS) Profile/Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Q03C1-2.40 en-US
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
Gionee50feature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
LG JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
GIONEE50 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo Q 3closeMRE Gionee50mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Gionee50feature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
MAUI based WAP Browsercloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 3C MRE Gionee50mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:43 | by ThaDafinser