User agent detail

BrightCrawler (http://www.brightcloud.com/brightcrawler.asp)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
BrightCrawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
BrightCrawler closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close HTCrawler (http:mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesBrightCrawlerclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
HTCrawler (http:mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:43 | by ThaDafinser