User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 ( Nokia5330XpressMusic/2.0 (p) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia5330XpressMusic Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.13301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 420closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia5330XpressMusicsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 5330close Nokia5330XpressMusiccloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420NokiaOS NokiaNokia 5330XpressMusiccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420 Nokia5330XpressMusicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:43 | by ThaDafinser