User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; JY-G4 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.123 Mobile Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
JiayuJY-G4 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.123closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364.123closeAndroid 4.2.1JiayuJY-G4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 25.0WebKit Android 4.2JiayuJY-G4smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.123closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.2.1JiayuJY-G4closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.123WebKit 537.22Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Android 4.2.1JiayuG4mobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.123closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2JiayuJY-G4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:43 | by ThaDafinser