User agent detail

VMVID Android Application (13, vmvid v2.1) - HTC HTC Vision htc_wwe - FFFFFFFF-AAAE-21FC-2384-40960F3CCA42
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCVision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
VMVID closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid HTCHTC Vision htc wwe - FFFFFFFF-AAAE-21FC-2384-40960F3CCA42mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android HTCHTC Visionsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid HTCVisioncloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android HTCHTC Vision htc wwe - FFFFFFFF-AAAE-21FC-2384-40960F3CCA42mobile:smartyescloseclose0.11201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.047 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:41 | by ThaDafinser