User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.63 Safari/537.36 SE 2.X MetaSr 1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
Sogou Explorer 2.0Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Sogou Explorer 2.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.11301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Sogou Explorer 2.XcloseWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.22502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Sogou Explorer 2WebKit Windows 8.1desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Sogou Explorer 1.0closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.63WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Sogou Explorer Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:41 | by ThaDafinser