User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; zh-cn; HUAWEI_T8950 Build/HuaweiT8950; 540*960) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1/UCWEB7.9.0.94/139/444
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiT8950 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.1WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.14701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 2.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 4.0HuaweiT8950smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0closeAndroid 4.0.4HuaweiT8950closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.08401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94WebKit 528.5Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9Webkit 528.5Android 4.0.4HuaweiHonor+mobile:smartyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:40 | by ThaDafinser