User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; zh-CN; MI 2A Build/JRO03L) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.7.5.418 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
UC Browser 9.7.5.418Android 4.1.1WebKit XiaomiMI 2Asmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.7U3 Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1XiaomiMI 2Amobile-browseryescloseclose0.25402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.7WebKit Android 4.1XiaomiMI 2Asmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.7.5closeAndroid 4.1.1XiaoMiMI 2Acloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.7.5.418WebKit 533.1Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.7Webkit 533.1Android 4.1.1XiaomiMi 2Amobile:smartyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.1XiaomiMI 2ASmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:40 | by ThaDafinser