User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; STB Linux; POLARIS6; UPLUSTVBROWSER)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/lg.yaml
Polaris 6 LGU+ tvtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.22302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.56206 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Polaris 6 LGU+ tvtelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 6.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:39 | by ThaDafinser