User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.4; Pt-br ; LG-E510f Build/GRJ22) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1/UCBrowser/8.3.0.143/145/352
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGE510f Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3LGOptimus HubMobile Phoneyes0.14101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.4GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.3WebKit Android 2.3LGE510fsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0closeAndroid 2.3.4LGE510fcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.12201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.3.0.143WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.4LGLGE510fcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.3Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.4LGOptimus Hubmobile:smartyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:39 | by ThaDafinser