User agent detail

LG-T320-Orange/V10a Obigo/Q7.3 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 MediaPlayer/LGPlayer/1.0 Android/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGT320 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.07101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-T320-Orange V10acloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q7 Android LGT320smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 7.3closeAndroid LGT320closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q7 Browser Q7 Android LGLGT320closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 7.3 Android LGT320mobile:smartyescloseclose0.08101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.043 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:38 | by ThaDafinser