User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; AT-AS55HD Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.48 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
WolfgangAT-AS55HD Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.48closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916.48closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 35.0Blink Android 4.2smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.48closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.2.2WolfgangAT-AS55HDcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.48WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.2.2WolfgangAT-AS55HDmobile:smartyescloseclose0.048 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.48closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:37 | by ThaDafinser