User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 7.0; WOW64; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/40.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-811.php
yesFake FirefoxBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake FirefoxBot/Crawler0.06501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 40.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 40.0closeWindows 7.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.24602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 40.0Gecko Windows NTdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 40.0closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 40.0closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 40.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 40.0Gecko 20100101Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 40.0Gecko 40.0Windows NT 7.0desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 40.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeNetBSD Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:36 | by ThaDafinser