User agent detail

MQQBrowser/Mini2.2 (Nokia5200/04.72)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia5200 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MQQBrowser Mini2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser Mini2.2close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia5200smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 04.72)closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mini 2.2close Nokia5200closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 5200closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser Mini 2.2 Series40 Nokia5200mobile:featureyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:35 | by ThaDafinser