User agent detail

SYM.S200.SYM.T63.DEWAV60A_64_11B_HW (MRE/3.1.00(1280);MAUI/_DY33891_Symphony_L102;BDATE/2014/04/18 14:22;LCD/240320;CHIP/MT6260;KEY/Normal;TOUCH/0;CAMERA/1;SENSOR/0;DEV/DEWAV60A_64_11B_HW;WAP Browser/MAUI (HTTP PGDL;HTTPS);GMOBI/001;MBOUNCE/002;MOMAGIC/003;INDEX/004;SPICEI2I/005;GAMELOFT/006;) Y3389_DY33891_Symphony_L102 Release/2014.04.18 WAP Browser/MAUI (HTTP PGDL; HTTPS) Profile/ Q03C1-2.40 en-US
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
MAUI Wap Browser 0.0JAVA unknownunknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
MAUI Wap Browser JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SYM closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo Q 3closeMRE SpiceI2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SpiceI2Ismartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
MAUI based WAP Browsercloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 3C MRE SpiceI2mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:35 | by ThaDafinser