User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Fedora; Linux armv7l; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 38.0Fedora Gecko 38.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 38.0Gecko 38.0Linux Smartphone OS Mobile Phoneyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 38.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 38.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 38.0Gecko Fedora desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 38.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 38.0closeFedora closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 38.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 38.0Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 38.0Gecko 38.0Fedora desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 38.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:35 | by ThaDafinser